WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama on Monday confirmed that
the US drone aircraft have struck Taliban and Al Qaeda targets within
Pakistan – operations that until now had not been officially
acknowledged.
When asked about the use of drones by his
administration in a chat with web users on Google+ and YouTube, Obama
said “a lot of these strikes have been in the FATA” – Pakistan’s
Federally Administered Tribal Areas.
“For the most part, they’ve
been very precise precision strikes against Al Qaeda and their
affiliates, and we’re very careful in terms of how it’s been applied,”
Obama said.
“This is a targeted focused effort at people who are
on a list of active terrorists, who are trying to go in and harm
Americans, hit American facilities, American bases, and so on.”
Explaining
that many strikes were carried out “on Al-Qaeda operatives in places
where the capacities of that military in that country may not be able to
get them,” Obama confirmed that Pakistan’s lawless tribal zone was a
target.
“So, obviously, a lotof these strikes have been in the
FATA, and going after Al Qaeda suspects who are up in very tough terrain
along the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan,” he said.
“For
us to be able to get them in another way would involve probably a lot
more intrusive military action than the ones we’re already engaging in.”
US
officials say Pakistan’s tribal belt provides sanctuary to Taliban
fighting for 10 years in Afghanistan, Al-Qaeda groups plotting attacks
on the West, Pakistani Taliban who routinely bomb Pakistan and other
foreign fighters.
Sixty-four US missile strikes were reported in
Pakistan’s semi-autonomous tribal belt last year, down from 101 reported
in 2010, according to AFP tallies.
According to the New America
Foundation, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, drone strikes in
Pakistan over the past eight years have killed at least 1,715 people,
and as many as 2,680 people.
The United States had until now
refused to discuss the strikes publicly, but the program has
dramatically increased as the Obama administration looks to withdraw all
foreign combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014.
In
October, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta acknowledged the CIA’s drone
program, but did not specifically indicate they were used in Pakistan
.
When
asked by AFP if Obama’s remarks signaled a change in US policy about
the drone program, a White House spokesman refused to comment.
The Pakistani government is understood to agree to the program despite popular opposition at home.
Drones have reportedly killed dozens of Al-Qaeda and Taliban operatives and hundreds of low-ranking fighters since 2004.
But
the missile strikes fuel widespread anti-American resentment, which is
running especially high in Pakistan since US air strikes inadvertently
killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in November.
A US-Nato investigation
blamed the deaths on a litany of errors and botched communications on
both sides. But Pakistan rejected the findings, insisting the strikes
had been deliberate.
Obama said drones had “not caused a huge
number of civilian casualties” and that it was “important for everybody
to understand that this thing is kept on a very tight leash.”
Islamabad
is now reviewing its entire alliance with the United States and has
kept its Afghan border closed to Nato supply convoys for two months.
It
ordered US personnel to leave Shamsi air base in western Pakistan,
widely believed to have been a hub for the CIA drone program, and is
thought likely to only reopen the Afghan border by exacting taxes on
convoys.
The State Department said on Monday it had used small,
unarmed surveillance drones to protect US diplomats in so-called
“critical threat environments” overseas.
The news emerged after
The New York Times reported that Iraqi officials have expressed outrage
at US use of a small fleet of drones to help protect the embassy,
consulates and American personnel in Iraq.
“The State Department
has always used a wide variety of security tools and techniques and
procedures to ensure the safety of our personnel and our facilities,”
spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said.
“We do have an unmanned aerial
vehicle (UAV) program used by the State Department,” she said, adding
the UAVs are “tiny” and “not capable of being armed” but designed to
provide pictures of US government facilities.
Monday, 30 January 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment